Okay Hollywood, listen up: it is time to stop portraying all Christians as two-dimensional bigots. It's so fucking tired at this point, that I'm embarrassed to see it. You'd think Hollywood producers would get the message, but in case they haven't:
- Not all Blacks are in gangs
- Not all Hispanics are drug lords
- Not all gays are designers or decorators
- Not all Muslims are terrorists
- Not all Jews control the media (or something like that)
- And not all Christians are shallow and filled with hate
As much as I wanted to love
Easy A, making a central character so one-note undermined that.
And as a follow-up, here is the demographic profile of the city of Ojai, California (the setting of the movie, and the home of Jamie Summers, the Bionic Woman):
- 88% Caucasian
- 12% NOT Caucasian
- 15% Hispanic (this is an ethnicity, not a race; Hispanics come from all races)
While the movie cleverly (and sweetly) includes a young Black actor, Bryce Clyde Jenkins (I had to work to find his name), as the heroine's sibling, that's about it for racial/ethnic diversity. I guess the movie really is an homage to 80s teen movies which were also lily white.
Okay, off the high horse, on to the usual "recap within the frame work of awards potential." Despite what you've read, I rather like the movie, despite the screenplay.
Overall, the movie is better as its discrete elements than it is as one piece. Emma Stone is adorable and funny, and could pick up a Golden Globe nomination (Best Actress in a Musical/Comedy), but that's as far as I see her getting. Still, that's a good step for her. I think this movie helps her career similar to the way
(500) Days of Summer helped Joseph Gordon-Levitt's. (Actually her agent should do everything he/she can to get her presenting at some awards shows this winter, she'll benefit more from those gift bags than a Golden Globe nomination.)
Amanda Bynes is
also adorable and funny, and could pick up a Golden Satellite nomination (they have separate Supporting Actor/Actress categories for Musical/Comedy and for Drama), but that's as far as I see her getting (the GS is lesser than the GG). If she is smart, she will try to leverage a slight resemblance to Christine O'Donnell before O'Donnell is (hopefully) just a punchline in about 4 months. Otherwise she's gone from "young actress I vaguely knew of" to "young actress I might remember."
I don't know how they got Patricia Clarkson, Stanley Tucci, Thomas Hayden Church and Lisa Kudrow for this movie, but all 4 of them are fantastic in the movie. Clarkson and Tucci, who both starred in the first season of
Murder One (how's that for old), play characters that are just too cool to be believable as parents--but they are really good doing it. Clarkson plays a character similar to her role on
Six Feet Under (for which she won 2 Emmys, the only actor to win an Emmy for the show) but I allow it since I've seen her be more versatile. But it would be nice to see someone think of Clarkson as something other than a free-spirited earth mother type. Tucci's coming out of playing an understanding husband in
Julie & Julia and a pedophile/serial killer in
Lovely Bones, so I think he's a little less type-cast at this point. I'll keep both of these actors on my dark horse list going into awards season. I can easily see these roles being included among a set of movies for a critics award or two (although let me say that, having seen the
Burlesque trailer twice now, I hope Tucci isn't winning for his work in
Easy A &
Burlesque only).
Thomas Hayden Church is really solid in an un-flashy role. I don't see him getting any awards attention for this. Lisa Kudrow also won't get any awards attention for this, but she shows some previously unseen skill in the movie. I've loved her many times in the past, but this is the first time I've seen her act without sounding affected in some way, like she was doing a character's voice. She's gets a couple of really meaty scenes that give me new esteem for her as an actress. But she's third in line for supporting actress consideration from this movie (Clarkson first, then Bynes).
The direction, cinematography and editing are all fine but nothing award-worthy. I liked the title credits presentation at first, but ultimately I found myself a little confused, and I'm the kind of person who reads title credits (so you might never notice).
The movie's biggest weakness, sadly, is the screenplay. There's a lot to like about it, but it feels a lot like someone wanted to make a deconstructed homage to
The Scarlet Letter and
Mean Girls at the exact same time. Too much. But in some fucked up way I can see this ending up with an Adapted Screenplay nomination--I just hope it doesn't.
In fact, I felt better about the movie leaving the theater than I do now, having slept on it. But I'm still undecided. The actors individually are much better than the movie as a whole.